B.F.Shilov
BASES OF THE UNIVERSUM THEORY
(The theory of spheres)
Introduction
- Love your neighbor as yourself, -
this commandment has appeared in the Pentateuch (19:18), and Jesus attached
extremely great importance to it (We shell consider this statement also in
detail in chapter 5). But why it concerns only my neighbor, why not everybody?
Let's try to find answer on a paper
(or on a screen). LetТs take a sheet of paper, then draw a lot of fatty points,
and letТs imagine that we have draw people. Now letТs draw a love for every
neighbor as lines connecting neighbors. And what do we see? (fig.1).
ааааааааааааааааааааааааааааа Fig.1
The intelligent network is before
us! This can be considered as a schematic image of a brain, of the World wide
Web etc.
And now we shell pass to the facts.
We shell begin with tiny insects Ц ants. A separate ant is a primitive
creature. It's confused moving, when it is alone and is far from an anthill,
rejects any assumptions of presence even of the minimum intelligence. At the
same time an anthill as a community shows much more reasonable behavior.
Cases are known when ants laid
tunnels under asphalt roads, built bridges, rafts at
flooding and so on.
The anthill organization reminds the state in which each worker gets training, specialization and raises qualification, passing to higher social levels.
Lifetime of an anthill equals from several
years till several centuries. Anthills are capable to integrate into a super
colonies, including hundred millions of insects. ааааааааа
The American entomologist William Morton
Wheeler has offered in 1910 with reference to ants the term
"superorganism" ([1], [2]).
Now the anthill is officially
recognized by a biological science as the kind of a live organism, and the
concept of "superorganism" is one of the main components in
cybernetics and in biological cybernetics where appears as the distributed
intellect.
And surely the most convincing
example of a superorganism is the World Wide Web Ц the Internet that more and
more reminds developing planetary intellect.
Let's note also, that human brain is a kind of Web too. And as the Internet or as an anthill it hasnТt theа Уmain antФ Ц a several billions of neurons participate in its work simultaneously, united in a uniform network.
Some facts, concerning peculiar, inexplicable by a modern science behavior of separate people and animals will be necessary for us too.
It is known that in the state of
shock a person not always becomes unconscious
completely. But its behavior in this case is very strange: it holds off the pain and in general behaves like a
primitive being. L.R.Habbard, the author of dianetics ([3]) explained it as
existence of the reserve system (Уthe fish intellectФ) that a person intends
for similar situations.
Though I would not dare to name it as an intellect. Some years ago the episodes have been shown in TV that have been done at a fire of high-rise hotel in Istanbul. The episode shakes where the man, standing on a balcony and captured by a flame, slowly brushes away tongues of flame from himself.
There are numerous cases also (known
to many surgeons) when already saved people suddenly died in the recover phase
without any reason.
And, in conclusion, we shell
consider a phenomenon that is the most interesting and will serve as the
main proof of the given theory validity.
The phenomenon is called
"fireball" or "ball lightning".
There is a set of theories explaining ball lightning, but none of them has received an absolute recognition.
Similar, but short-lived phenomena have been succeeding in the different ways in vitro ([4] Ц [6]). But till now they did not create any pilot plant reproducing a fireball identical to descriptions of eyewitnesses.
Let's remind the basic unusual
features of ball lightning:
1) the big range of apparent sizes:
from 1 sm to 27 sm, and sometimes Ц to 1 meter in diameter;
2) wide dispersion of lifetime: from 1 second
till 4 minutes, and sometimes Ц till 30 minutes;
3) ability to pass through substance (more often - through glass, sometimes Ц through a wall). After that the set of microscopic apertures with melted edges appears in substance (where fireball has passed). At the same time a torrential rain passes through fireball, without exerting any influence upon it;
4) deformability and ability to get
through small apertures;
5) unpredictability of movement.
Thus fireball can fly at any height and move even against a wind;
6) ability to bypass subjects during
movement;
7) presence in some cases of a thin
grid visible to unaided eye in all volume of
ball lightning;
8) ability to blow up at the most unexpected moment.
The further statements have the purpose of explaining all these facts (and many others) scientifically.
Chapter 1. The mathematical
theory of intelligence
Phenomena of type
"superorganism", shown in diversified forms, leads to the natural
conclusion:
The First postulate: any intellect is a finite set of
intellects operating as a unit.
The given formulation, as it is easy
to notice, is a recursion.
Infinite
nesting immediately follows from it. At first sight it seems physically impossible.
However, letТs not hurry Ц for the present it is purely mathematical theory. We
shell pass to physical realization in the next chapter.
It is just the First postulate that
defines difference between the true intellect and the artificial one. The artificial
intellect will be finite always, no matter how
it would be improved. The natural intellect by number of items is a numerable
set and is infinite in its appearances and possibilities.
ааааааааа The structure of a specific intellect
from the position of the graph theory can be
defined as the infinite oriented tree in which every node (except initial) has
one parent (incoming arc) and a finite number of children (outgoing arcs).
The Second postulate: any intellect and only one is a
subject having self-consciousness (possessing its own EGO).
ааааааааа Hereinafter
we shell understand as EGO a consciousness of himself as the epicentrum.
ааааааааа Presence
of EGO does not cause doubts in case of human being. Its presence at other
forms and levels will be proved in the following chapter as the fact of
isomorphism of intellects.
The Third postulate: any intellect has parental one in
which it is one of the components.
ааааааааа
ааааааааа The
given postulate is not at all obvious. However in the following chapter we
shell prove its physical reliability.
ааааааааа The
combination of the first and third postulates generates infinite enclosure,
both deep into and upwards.
ааааааааа If
we set as equivalence to each intellect a circle filled with circles of a
smaller size (i.e., intellects generating given) we shell receive a plane
filled by circles of however 
large and however small sizes
(fig.2).
аааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааа fig.2
The Fourth postulate: Set of all intellects is a
hyperintellect (the higher reason), possessing own EGO and cardinality of
continuum.
ааааааааа We
can put in conformity to each intellect a subset of numerable set and vice
versa. Hence, in accordance with the theorem
of Cantor, the set of intellects really possesses cardinality of continuum.
We shell accept the rest still without a proof, taking into account that it does not affect a course of the further reasoning in any way. However we can give the indirect proof based on the principle of mathematical induction.
Letа
I1, I2, Е, In, Е to be a sequence of intellects, such that In is one of intellects forming
intellectа In+1
(extending sequence). Then the limit of sequence at n → ∞ is a
hyperintellect. And since all members of sequence possess EGO it is natural to
suppose that the limit possesses this property too.
Chapter 2. Physical bases of
intelligence
Along with the classical concept assuming that we live in three-dimensional Euclidean space, the hypothesis about the self-closed space with Riemann geometry is alternatively considered long ago. And, in connection with the concept of the extending universe following from the theory of relativity, the second alternative seems more preferable.
From the point of view of the
Universum theory stated here, only a limited universe is physically possible.
More exactly, we shell proceed from the
following definition:
The Universe is self-closed physical
world with Riemann geometry, topologically isomorphic to three-dimensional
hypersphere of four-dimensional Euclidean space.
Such definition gives a chance (probably, the unique one) to define the physical carrier of intellect:
The
Spirit (the soul) is a physical object, topologically isomorphic to a
four-dimensional ball and possessing intellect. The Spirit shell is the
universe.
All Spirits whose intellects
generate intellect of considered one are inside it.
Thus, it is possible to consider the circles shown on fig.2 as a projection of Spirits to any plane. At this physical universes look like a circles.
Hereinafter, we shell use following definitions
for the purpose of brevity of a description and to underline analogies with
known religious concepts:
Firmament Ц a Universe that is a shell of
a Spirit,
Heaven Ц an internal part of a Spirit.
Of course, a question appears at once: how it can be associated withа reasonableness of a human being, with complexity of behavior of an anthill or with a civilization as a whole?
We have come up to the most
important thesis of the theory.
Any material subject is
a symbiosis of a certain Spirit and a certain Body.
A body of a person, an anthill, a biosphere of a planet and other biological objects of any Universe can be considered as a Body.
ааааааааа The
symbiosis engine is simple enough: a child Spirit (one
of those who inhabits in the Heaven of the given parental Spirit)
connects to the Body, which contains in the Firmament of a parental one. Since
the Firmament of a child Spirit is also three-dimensional then the part of its
shell concatenates with a part of the Bodies volume (I think - with a brain in
case of the human being). Thus the Body becomes animated, and the Spirit
self-restricts in Body limits. That is, if in the free state of the Spirit its mutation covers all shell and with the assistance
of all components, then in the state of symbiosis mentation
closed in the contact area, where the main stream of information arrives
from, becomes leader. Thus the Spirit does as though it forgets the past, and processes
proceeding outside of contact area are perceived by it as sub consciousness and
intuition.
Obvious isomorphism of Spirits of various levels leads us with inevitability to the conclusion that any Spirit (and consequently, any intellect) possesses the EGO.
Mentation of a Spirit is a set of information interchange streams between all child Spirits being in symbiosis. That is, the main mentation processes proceeds in the Firmament of a Spirit (just as it do in a bark of hemispheres in case of human being or on a planet surface Ц in case of civilization). Processes, proceeding in the Heaven of a Spirit, have auxiliary meaning, but are necessary too. They are, obviously, for maintenance of internal organization and to support effective behavior of the basic process.
Any attempts of the further
detailing would be a fancy, as we havenТt
any corresponding information.
The question of properties and
metrics of enclosing four-dimensional space
is still open too. If this space is unlimited, then 3rd and 4th postulates from
chapter 2 are realized and almost obvious. For, if there were a certain highest
level of Spirits, then being completely identical to underlying levels it would
be doomed to degradation because of absence of the basic function Ц symbiosis with
material objects.
But if we assume that enclosing four-dimensional space also possesses
Riemann geometry with nonzero curvature, i.e., is limited and closed, then we
shell find, that within this space the third and fourth postulates are not
realized at all.
Or more exactly, in this space there
would be a top level of Spirits forming the closed net. And there is a problem
again:а absence of functionality. Thus
we come to conclusion that the enclosing
space with inevitability is unlimited.
And after all we come up to understanding that
Universum ≡ the Lord
and that every Spirit is a particle of the
Lord.
Chapter 3. Laws of the uniform theory of All Existing
The first law, which literally suggests itself,
is
1. The law of reincarnation: Any Spirit is capable for
reincarnation (for multiple entry into state of symbiosis with various
bodies).
Moreover, reincarnation is the necessary condition of active state maintenance of the parental Spirit. It follows from the second and third laws.
2. The
law of imperishability: Any Spirit is immortal.
3. The
law of impracticability: nobody and nothing can create a new Spirit.
ааааааааа The
second law is almost obvious: the universes of which the Spirit consists are
eternal essences. Therefore the Spirit is eternal too.
ааааааааа The third law follows from internal structure
of a Spirit Ц it is impossible to create infinite number of levels during a
finite time.
ааааааааа Two
exceptions are possible here: 1) disintegration of a Spirit caused by internal
contradictions between components of the underlying level, 2) creation of a new
Spirit by integrating a group of Spirits from one level.
We shell not consider such processes
further, as mechanisms of them are unknown to us.
Biological objects with which
Spirits enter into symbiosis, always have limited time of the life (unlike Spirits),
but at the same time they possess ability to reproduction. For this reasons the
same Spirits are forced to enter again and again into symbiosis with newborn
objects.
4. The law of apocalypse: the number of
civilization subjects cannot exceed the number of child spirits of
civilization.
ааааааааа The law is obvious. But the important
consequence follows from it: in case of uncontrolled growth of the planetary
biological objects number, which are not capable to realize itself without
symbiosis, the state of Apocalypse (of the total death) becomes: the Spirit of
the Civilization breaks off symbiosis with a planet that in turn courses
madness and destruction of all living. Then all human souls come back to the
Heaven of the Civilization Spirit, and the last Ц to the Heaven of parental one
(most likely Ц of Galaxy one).
ааааааааа The
Apocalypse can occur by other reasons (asteroid, flash on the sun, anthropogenic disaster, etc.). But in our case
just population causes it.
5. The
law of closure: None
biological object existing in the state of symbiosis can leave a contact zone
of the parental Spirit.
The law
follows from the fact that any child Spirit, being in a state of symbiosis with
a body, automatically loses contact with it when exceeds the limits of the
contact zone of parental Spirit as it is shown in fig.3. That in turn courses
inevitable death of the biological object.
ааааааааа Fig.3.
Rupture of symbiosis
In fig.3 the state of symbiosis is
shown as 1 and the state of ruptured symbiosis Ц as 2.
ааааааааа The
sad conclusion follows from here: our descendants never will depart to far
stars. Moreover, there is suspicion, that even human flights to Mars are not
possible. It depends on the size of the contact zone of our Civilization.
Chapter 4. Classification of Spirits
Two independent kinds of activity are accurately allocated in each
Spirit:
1) external activity assuming participation in
processes of parental Spirit (its introduction into symbiosis with objects of
its Firmament, the information interchange with other members of the Heaven
etc.);
2)
internal activity directed to maintenance of biological processes in its own
Firmament (management of the child Spirits symbiosis with biological objects of
its Firmament).
ааааааааа But
external symbiosis also requires participation in it of child Spirits. In case
of Civilization Spirit, when it enters into symbiosis with a planet, some child
Spirits should create their own small contact areas in the formed contact area
of the parent, entering into symbiosis with objects of a planet (with people,
animals, birds etc.). In case of human being, some child Spirits should enter
into symbiosis with neurons of a body.
ааааааааа The
conclusion follows from here: the area of external contact is a special area in
the Firmament (i.e. in the shell) of a Spirit that must be free from physical
bodies (galaxies, stars, planets etc.). Otherwise there would be a conflict
between internal and external symbiosis.
ааааааааа Thus,
we have come to definition:
Eye is a special spheroid area in the Firmament
of a Spirit, free from physical bodies and intended for external contacts.
ааааааааа It is possible to assume that each
Spirit has at least two Eyes as even in a state of symbiosis it should have
possibility of information exchange with other ones staying in the Heaven of
the parent.
Probably, we already have found such Eye in our universe. Some years ago NASA has published in Internet the message about detection of the colossal dark area not containing sources of radiation.
ааааааааа Passing to classification of Spirits,
we shell consider a galaxy as the maximum biological object in the Firmament of
a Spirit with which symbiosis is possible. If there are larger objects (for
example, metagalaxies), it will not affect result essentially.
ааааааааа From
last precondition we receive that in any Spirit all child Spirits carrying out
internal symbiosis, are the same. Further we shell name them as Spirits of
Associations as they operate with distributed communities of subjects (at
the level of galaxies).
ааааааааа Specialization of a Spirits appears
only in external contacts. Here we shell risk again making the following
classification, which seems natural:
A. Spirit
of Association;
C. Spirit
of a Civilization;
I. Spirit
of an Individual (of a human being, animal, bird);
G. Spirit
of Group (of a flock);
E. Spirit
of a Cell.
Possible types of external symbiosis are shown
in fig.4, where child Spirits, participating in external symbiosis, are shown
as small circles, and parental one Ц as big circle.
Fig.4. Possible types of external symbiosis
Here we have risked assuming that the same Spirits of Associations carries out a direct control of neurons also as the most universal ones. In any case it was necessary to close the chain, as a cell is a minimal biological object.
Chapter 5. Justification of the Spheres Theory
ааааааааа Only
correspondence of the Spheres Theory to realities of the world and to
experience of previous generations can serve as its justification in our case.
ааааааааа Let's
return to the facts considered in the introduction and check up: do they
correspond to given theory or not?
ааааааааа We shell begin with last phenomenon -
with ball lightning(BL). Explanation of the phenomenon may seems horrible, but
it corresponds to features ofа BL so
well that does not leaves any doubts of the given theory validity.
ааааааааа Let's
imagine that a lightning has struck a person (a human being, an animal, a
sitting bird). Since lightning strikes, as a rule, into the highest point of an
object then in this case it will rush into the head. The skull thus will break
up, and the Spirit instinctively will dash aside and really will fly out with a
grid of neurons to which it is attached. In this case it is possible, as the
head, in which neurons were, practically doesnТt exist now. Neurons have time
to receive a huge electric charge, but do not scatter, as they are kept by the
Spirit. So BL arises.
The Spirit remaining in a state of
symbiosis feels a shock: it doesnТt understand what happened with it. It
doesnТt feel a body; all its external sense organs are disconnected. But own
internal sight (through contact area Ц the Spirit Eye) and impellent machinery have turned on. It sees dimly the world
around it through a shining grid of neurons and begins to rush about searching of the help. If it was a human being or
a domestic animal before, than, having seen the nearest building, the Spirit
directs to it searching of people. It sees a
window, but doesnТt see a glass and passes through it. More precisely, the
heated grid of neurons passes through glass burning holes. The Spirit itself
moves in the other (external) space and doesnТt feel resistance since it only
contacts with the grid of neurons.
Having seen a person, BL directs to it in hope to receive help. This known fact was not mentioned in scientific literature Ц probably, because of its antiscientific character. BL sees large objects and tries to bypass them.
It is deduced from this state, most likely, by free Spirits (which are not being in symbiosis). They simply tear away it from a grid, violently breaking off this symbiosis. The force, keeping charges, disappears and BL blows up. At this charged neurons, as small lightnings, rush towards the nearest current-carrying surfaces (where there are induced charges already). This explains strong damage of metal objects namely.
ааааааааа In
this sense it would be more correct to name BL a spherical cloud, as all
neurons in it have identical charge induced by a real thundercloud before the
occurrence of a lightning.
ааааааааа The
hypothesis about opposite charges existing
up to now was caused, apparently, by the fact, that researchers did not see the
force, capable to keep such charge in small volume of air.
It is necessary to explain ability of BL to get through cracks and apertures. And it also isnТt difficult for a Spirit. Suffice it to mention that its child Cell Spirits contacting with neurons possess ability of moving too. Therefore, moving them in contact area, the Spirit can drag a grid of neurons through any crack, which it sees.
ааааааааа The
great strengths of pushing away arising between the similar
charges are significant only in our space. For Spirit, most likely, they
are insignificant.
ааааааааа The range of observed BL sizes
practically corresponds to a range of a brain sizes from small mammals and
birds to the human being and elephant. And abnormally big sizes about 1 meter
are explainable also. It arises, when the lightning strikes into a tree, in
which (or under which) there is an anthill. In principle a Spirit of an anthill
can form BL of much larger size, but such cases, it seems, are exclusively
rare.
ааааааааа Let's pass to consideration of other
facts.
ааааааааа Only
a Spirit can feel a physical pain (As well as mental one) as a subject. A body
itself is insensible even having ideally working nervous system. Not the man,
but a live corpse whom the spirit has already left was in fire there, on the
roof of the Turkish hotel.
ааааааааа The same explains the inexplicable
death of the recovering people: doctors have rescued a body, but the Spirit has
already begun process of detachment and it simply hasnТt noticed this.
Existence of Group Spirits perfectly
explains the developed social structure and complicated behavior of anthills.
ааааааааа It is time to recollect about
reincarnation. It is interesting that still ancient Aryans had notions about
reincarnation at several thousands years B.C. This notions being written down
in Vedas have got development and various interpretations primarily in
Hinduism, and then and in Buddhism. Almost simultaneously with Buddhism
philosophical doctrines recognizing reincarnation appear in Greece and in Judea
(Pythagoreans and Pharisees).
ааааааааа The
belief in reincarnation existed at some native nationalities of the North and
America too. It is interesting that early Christianity recognized reincarnation
as the natural phenomenon also.
ааааааааа As we already have consistent physical
model, it is time to recollect the facts. The American professor Janom
Stevenson, the biochemist and the psychiatrist who during 40 years investigated
messages from over 3000 children telling about events of the past have
published the most detailed data in favor of reincarnation existence
hypothesis. In each case Stevenson regularly documented statements of the child
and compared them with actual events ([7], [8], [91]).
Reaction of scientific community to
Stevenson's works was negative. Critics have impeached
methods of his researches and his conclusions drawn from it. However some
Stevenson's supporters consider that his work was spent with due scientific
rigidity.
This statistics can be considered also from quite another positions. Those some thousand children, which were studied by Stevenson, are not at all a parent population (speaking by language of modern statistics), and only a small sampling from the planet population. And what if we shell take into account that the overwhelming majority of kids in general tell nobody about their reminiscences?
This information was shortly forgotten, as we almost donТt remember us when we were 3-5 years old, and our children's imaginations all the more.
Why we believe that people have
dreams? ItТs because we see it ourselves. And what if dreams would see only
children from 3 to 5 and some odd fellows? There would be the same: the
official science would reject any works devoted to dreams as a rank nonsense.
ааааааааа The following phenomenon is related to
mental polarity of male and female representatives and to damages of this
polarity.
It is known that physiologically two
chromosomes of DNA define the sex of a future child. The selection of hormone
that will be suppressing depends on chromosome that will get the child (X or
Y). But how to place into one chromosome the future love to fishing, hunting,
to war-games? Or on the contrary: to dresses, hair dresses, dances? And after
all mental orientation is appreciable already at preschool age where hormones
still sleep.
ааааааааа On
the other hand, the facts of opposite mentality are known at absolutely normal
physiology. Especially it is noticeable in case of men: their propensity to
dresses, cosmetics and, at last, to breach of sexual orientation. Similar
phenomena occur among women too. The brightest and outstanding example is
Jeanne dТArc. The Englishmen, who have captured her, couldnТt detect any
anatomic anomaly in her. But this
hundred-per-cent woman governed armies and won battles. It is rather than man's
quality, it is captainship. This is not peculiar to women at all.
ааааааааа All that is perfectly explained by
errors of sex detection at Spirit introduction into symbiosis with a body. In
addition it shows us that Spirits of human beings are bipolar. It is a matter
of course. It is experience of many reincarnations that forms male or female
mentality of a Spirit.
ааааааааа
Chapter 6. Relations with teachings of Jesus
Christianity, like any other
religion, is based on faith and therefore canТt be considered as a scientific
theory. Nevertheless, the study of the "New testament", namely the
Gospels, led me to belief that Jesus from Nazareth had specific knowledge and
ideas about arrangement of the Universum, which, in their aggregate, can be
conceded as teachings, similar to the theory of spheres.
ааааааааа For
openers letТs revert to the commandment examined in introduction: аУLove your neighbor as yourselfФ.
Where calles Jesus to? When disciples
asked him: "Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?"
(Matthew 22:36-40). He said, УThou shalt Love the Lord thy God with all thy
heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and
greatest precept; the second similar to it: love near yours, as itself.
On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophetsФ.
The words "similar to it" are not accidental, for both commandments will call to the same, if we shell understand "the Lord thy God" as the Spirit of our Civilization. From the point of the spheres theory another cannot be: if you care about the prosperity of your civilization, then the surest way is to develop and strengthen its intellectual network (thatТs, its mind). This can be done technically (by improving the transport and communications), but it is extremely desirable and always helpful to observe the second commandment (love your neighbor as yourself).
Summarizing, we can say: these
commandments express the Highest Principle of the Universum.
- Our father, who art in heaven! - these words begin the only prayer (Matthew 6:9), which Jesus bequeathed to his disciples and successors. Whom is calling prayer to?
No need to be especially observant
to notice: the treatment as "our Father", "Father in
Heaven" or simply "Father" can be found in the speech of Jesus
much more than the Lord or God. In the Gospel of Thomas Jesus uses the word
УGodФ only once, and even in the proverb:
"Give Caesar what belongs to
Caesar, give God what belongs to God, and give me what is mine" (Thomas,
100).
Is it an accidental coincidence? Of
course, it is not.
If we identify the "Kingdom of
heaven" as Heaven of the Civilization Spiritа (as it is understood in the theory of spheres), then immediately
becomes obvious, that the УFather in HeavenФ is no other then the Spirit of our
civilization.
The following parable can serve as
confirmation.
"The disciples said to Jesus:
Tell us what the kingdom of heaven is like. He said to them: It is like a
mustard seed. It is the smallest of all seeds. But when it falls on tilled
soil, it produces a great plant and becomes a shelter for birds of the
sky" (Thomas, 20).
Indeed, every Spirit, according to
the theory of spheres, exists and is great thanks to its "birds of the
sky" - the souls that dwell in its Heaven.
And the more is number of
"birds" and their activity, the greater is the "Kingdom of
heaven". This is true both for the Spirit of civilization and for our
souls. Because each of us is Father or Mother, Уwho art in heavenФ too -
for those, who dwell inside of us (more precisely, inside of our souls).
Somebody may objects that Jesus
never spoke about the principle of nesting (every Spirit-Son is at the same
time the Spirit-Father).
But let us remember:
"Jesus said: If those who lead
you say: - See, the kingdom is in the sky! - Then the birds of heaven will
precede you. If they tell you that it is in the sea, then the fish will precede
you. But the kingdom is within you and outside you" (Thomas, 2).
This is not a beautiful allegory.
This is the exact formula (fig.5):
аааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааа Fig.5.
The kingdom that is within you - it
is the Heaven of your soul (of Spirit-Son or Spirit-Daughter), and the kingdom
that is out of you - it is the Heaven of your Father (in our case - the Spirit
of civilization).
It is interesting that Jesus
straightly says, that the Father can be seen:
УWhen you see one who was not born
of woman, fall down prostrate and worship him, for he is your FatherФ (Thomas,
15).
Similarly in Matthew:
УSee that you do not despise one of
these little ones; for I say unto you, that in heaven their Angels do always
behold the face of My Father in HeavenФ (Matthew, 18:10).
And Jesus mentioned and more than
once the Creator as the hyperintellect (higher reason), which is above all of
this:
"Whoever blasphemes against the
father will be forgiven, and whoever blasphemes against the son will be
forgiven, but whoever blasphemes against the holy spirit will not be forgiven
either on earth or in heaven" (Thomas, 44).
Here's the Holy Trinity for you - as
a brief outline of the intellects nesting principle in the theory of spheres.
Now letТs consider one of the most mysterious utterances of Jesus:
УThe eye is the lamp of the body.
So, if your eye is sound, your whole body will be full of light; but if your
eye is not sound, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light
in you is darkness, how great is the darkness!Ф (Matthew, 6:22- 23).
Mysterious it is though there are a
number of different interpretations of it, and disputes still proceed
(especially in the internet) about what kind of interpretation is correct.
If we assume that Jesus had in mind the ordinary eye, then why it is the lamp? Eyes canТt shine! And why it is single (we aren't Cyclops)? And how visual acuity may be connected with good or evil (which Jesus figuratively associated with light and dark)?
All becomes clear at once if we
recall that in the spheres theory an Eye is a contact zone through which a
Spirit produces the symbiosis with a Body.
So the purity of the Eye is,
figuratively speaking, the purity of the soul. And if the soul is dark (wicked,
selfish), then the light from it is darkness. That is why Jesus says at the end
of utterance: if even the light of the soul is dark, then how dark would be the
soul itself?
Jesus didnТt proclaim Reincarnation
in explicit form as a sequence of interchanging states: Angel (free Spirit) -
Human being (Spirit in the state of symbiosis). But this is one of the typical
statements:
"The disciples said to Jesus,
"Tell us how our end will be."
аJesus said, "Have you discovered, then, the beginning, that
you look for the end? For where the beginning is, there will the end be. Blessed
is he who will take his place in the beginning; he will know the end and
will not experience death" (Thomas, 18).
That is, Jesus explains to his disciples that they simply will return to their original state, which preceded the entry into symbiosis with a body. Here words УBlessed is he who will take his place in the beginningФ are especially allocated. Thus Jesus says that it will be repeated, and that before every entry into the next life every Angel will be happy and will not experience death, because he will know: only a body dies.
Attempt of Jesus to explain
contemporaries, what they will feel, when return to the Kingdom of Heaven is
interesting and even fun:
"When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female- female, and when you fashion eyes in the place of an eye, and a hand in place of a hand, and a foot in place of a foot, and a likeness in place of a likeness; then will you enter the kingdom " (Thomas, 22).
How else might Jesus explain, what is a four-dimensional space, to people familiar only with the basics of arithmetic? Even the modern person with a university education is able to accept it only as an abstraction, because our imagination, alas, is three-dimensional.
But every fragment of this saying we may explain now.
"When you make the two
one" - transition from the state of symbiosis (Spirit + body) to the state
of pure spirit (Angel).
"... when you make the inside
like the outside ..." - an attempt to explain perceptions in
four-dimensional space. For example, Angel perceives a three-dimensional body
as flat: inner parts of a body are on the surface for Angel, and old surface isnТt
distinguished in new surface of a body. The concepts of top-bottom have become
conditional at all.
"... when you make the male and
the female one and the same ..." - this is obvious, for Angels havenТt sexual characters,
and sexual orientation persists only mentally (as the memory of the Spirit).
"... when you fashion eyes in the place of an eye, ... likeness in place of a likeness Е" - this means that instead of its real image (four-dimensional ball with one Eye) the Spirit restores your persistent image of the Angel, which it translates to other Angels. It would be absurd to believe that Angels perceive each other as four-dimensional balls (though physically it is just so). From the sayings of Jesus we can conclude that the "vision" of Angels is constructed so, that they "see "each other by way of projecting (intangible) images, which they create themselves.
The conclusion
ааааааааа "Jesus
said: Become passers-by" (Thomas, 42). I think that he called not to
indifference, but to a more quiet and more philosophical outlook on life.
Death or treason of near and dear ones is always shocking for us and sometimes pushes people to mad acts: revenge, suicide, etc. We must remember that all of this, as well as the life itself Ц are only episodes in a long chain of reincarnations.
And the only things, which worth to
be sad about, are souls: those who degrade, those who became embittered, those
who misled in himself and felled into madness, etc. - Because there is nothing
sadder than degradation and death of a Spirit.
A real tragedy for all of us can be only the Apocalypse, because in this case our souls for many thousands of years will loaf in the Heaven of the Father before he will got another planet for development (instead of the ruined one).
References
1. Wheeler,
W. M. Social life among the insects. New York, 1923. vii + 375 p.
2.
Wheeler, W. M. Emergent Evolution and the Social. Science, 1926, 44, 433-440.
3.
L.R.Habbard. Dianetics: Modern science of mental
health. - Moscow.: Publishing group New Era, 1996.
4. Singer,
Stanley (1971). The Nature of Ball Lightning. New York: Plenum Press.
5. Barry,
James Dale (1980). Ball Lightning and Bead Lightning. New York: Plenum Press.
ISBN 0306402726.
6. P.L.Kapitsa. On the Nature of Ball Lighting, Reports of the USSR
Academy of Science (Doklady), 1955, v.1, No. 2, pp. 245-248 (in Russian).
7. Stevenson, Ian (1974). Twenty cases suggestive of reincarnation,
second (revised and enlarged) edition, University of Virginia Press. ISBN
9780813908724
8. Ian Stevenson. "The Explanatory Value of the Idea of
Reincarnation", Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 164:305-326, 1977.
9. Professor Ian Stevenson, The Daily Telegraph, February 12, 2007.
10.
Shilov B.F. УBases of the Universum theory (The theory of spheres)Ф, on-line
journal www.filosofia.ru/76624, 15.05.2011 (in Russian).
11.
Shilov B.F. УTeachings of Jesus from the theory of spheres positionФ, on-line
journal www.filosofia.ru/76629, 18.09.2011 (in Russian).
